As a father of four, finding a balance of screen time usage in children is critically important and personal, and I’m not alone. According to a survey by Pew Research, 71% of parents are concerned that their child might spend too much time on screens. Lucky for me, my partner Brittany has a degree, as well as, significant experience in Early Childhood Development and Education, and I have a Computer Science and Engineering background. Brittany leads the charge with the kid’s development and I lead the charge in configuring the tech. Even still, the challenges persist as we are constantly asking questions and evaluating our approach.
How much screen time is too much? Does screen time cause ADHD? How do we prevent cyberbullying? How can we track what our kids are doing online? Can I prevent predators from communicating with my child? What the heck is Minecraft? My goodness, what does it all mean? There is so much information out there that it is hard to know where to start. Through our series of guides, we’ve broken down our research into consumable chunks of actionable information you can apply today. This guide is specifically about the child development aspects of screen time.
What does the research say? Continue reading for a collection of key points from several journals and studies on how screen time affects child development.
Does screen time affect child development?
The bad
The reasons for parents’ anxiety over screen usage are well-documented and well-known. According to multiple studies, there is “evidence that higher levels of screen time are associated with a variety of health harms for children and young people, with evidence strongest for adiposity, unhealthy diet, depressive symptoms, and quality of life.” In children under five, studies have shown that more screen time is linked to lower brain development.
Some doctors claim screen time floods children’s brains with dopamine creating a feedback loop that impairs impulse control. Others suggest there may be a causal link between excessive screen exposure and autistic-like symptoms later on. We’ve all probably felt or expressed concerns about violent content leading to aggressive behavior.
The good and the not bad
Is it all bad though? In an article published in the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Andrew Przybylski asserts that children spending between one and two hours a day engaged in television-based or digital device activities are “more likely to have better levels of social and emotional well-being than non-users.”
The American Psychological Association tends to agree that it’s not simply a black-and-white issue. First of all, a lot of these studies show a correlation, but it is difficult to pin down a causal relationship. Common Sense Media for example performed a study revealing a substantial disparity in media use based on socioeconomic status. The findings exposed that children in high-income families were using screens for nearly two hours fewer each day.
Are relationships between screen usage and developmental delays the result of screen usage or lack of other resources? When consuming research on screen usage, it is important to question what hidden biases exist in the data.
Screens can also be used as teaching tools. Data collected from parents based on recall is unreliable. According to the APA, “many studies lump all screen time together into one category, though it seems unlikely chatting with Grandma, for example, would have much in common with playing Grand Theft Auto V.”
Age-based research
Most research is broken down into the same age brackets used to establish the recommendations by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The current age brackets and recommendations are:
- Ages < 18 months: avoid screens except for video chatting
- Ages 18 months – 24 months: Parents should choose high-quality programming and be present with children while watching
- Ages 2 years – 5 years: limit screen time to one hour per day with high-quality programming.
- Ages 6 and up: Establish limits on screen time and media usage. Refer to the Family Media Plan.
We tend to appreciate the AAP because it is comprised of 67,000 pediatricians, but we also tend not to blindly follow their recommendations. Below are outcomes from several other studies that we haven’t linked yet in each age bracket.
Note: when searching for research papers, we limit our search to only return peer-reviewed research. We assume that peer-reviewed papers are more likely to be well-received and accepted by the community of practice.
Ages < 18 months:
- A report in Infant Behavior and Development found that “increased infant screen time appears to disrupt processes that foster social-emotional competence in part via a reduction in the amount of parent-infant play without screens.”
- Similar to the findings of Common Sense Media above, another study published in Infant Behavior and Development found that lower parent education was associated with greater infant screen exposure and use. Of infants exposed to screens, 70% had a screen in the room where they slept.
Ages 18 months – 24 months:
- In Family Matters: Newsletter of the Australian Institute of Family Studies, researchers concluded that children’s development of vocabulary and literacy has less to do with time spent on media and more to do with parent level of educational attainment and parent participation in media use.
- Several other studies, however, including one published by Acta Pediatrics conclude that there is a relationship between excessive screen usage and delayed language development.
Ages 2 years – 5 years:
- An article published in Education Sciences interviewed 266 parents and 9 preschool teachers. They found that parents and teachers alike agree that beyond the benefits of screen time, play patterns and slower language development appear to be issued with increased screen time in toddlers.
- In a study published in JAMA Pediatrics, higher levels of screen time in children aged 24 and 36 months were associated with poor performance on a screening measure assessing children’s achievement of development milestones at 36 and 60 months, respectively.
- In another study available in JAMA Pediatrics, higher than recommended screen-based media usage correlated to lower microstructural integrity of brain white matter tracts that support language, executive functions, and emergent literacy skills.
- In a study published in the National Library of Medicine, researchers found that screen time is associated with inattention problems in preschoolers.
- Other researchers found no statistically significant difference in children comparing those who limited screen time and those who didn’t.
Ages 6 +
- In the publication Sleep Medicine Reviews, a systematic examination of over 67 studies found that screen time was adversely associated with sleep outcomes in 90% of studies.
- A study by Nature Communication found that social media use has an outsized effect on adolescents. In particular, behaviors such as social reward processing, emotion-based processing, regulation, and mentalizing about others are still underdeveloped and undergoing significant changes during adolescence. The research suggests that “emerging trajectory of acceptance sensitivity, peer ‘obedience’, and emotion precedence may make adolescents specifically susceptible to sensationalist and fake news, unrealistic self-expectations, or regulating emotions through adverse use of media.”
- Most research tends to focus on the negative aspects of excessive screen time. A study from the University of Colorado at Boulder, however, suggests that kids who spend more time in front of screens tend to have more close friends.
Quality screen time is more important than quantity.
In light of the plethora of information available in research papers, the popular narrative that screen time is always bad needs to be revisited. Screens have become not only ubiquitous but essential components of everyday life.
In a release, Professor Andrew Przybylski, Director of Research at the Oxford Internet Institute stated “Calls for blanket technology bans and age restrictions on technology access do not constitute evidence-based or indeed ethical advice, particularly as screen usage in some cases has a net positive impact,”
He continues, “Our research set out to address this gap. Very few children, if any, routinely use television and device-based screens enough, on average, to show significantly lower levels of psychological functioning. Instead, these findings indicate that other aspects of digital engagement, including what is on screens and how caregivers moderate their use, are far more important.”
Parent involvement in screen usage
As a father of four, my children find the use of technology to be completely native. They find modern technology such as smartwatches and tablets more native than the television was to me. Gone are the days of watching whatever happens to be on the TV. Children today are exposed to a firehose of content. You have the ability to tame that firehose down to a faucet, maximize positive outcomes of time spent in front of screens, and educate your children to protect themselves.
Our family limits screen time significantly more than our peers. Our youngest kids have been exposed to far more screens at an earlier age than our oldest. Developmentally they’re all on par with each other. I’m dealing with a small sample size, but it’s the most relevant, complete, and important sample I will ever deal with. It also illustrates one of the original points that screen use can mean many things. Parent involvement, paying attention, and working with your health care team on an individualized plan is best for all.
If you’re asking yourself, how much screen time is OK for my kids? We have a list of resources to help get you started. Be sure to place high importance on the type of screen usage and content that is being consumed.
Brittany Baron
